It was finally held yesterday, the City Council . In the circumstances, it was stated very busy ... and so it was! Now, at the opening, the leader of the PDL Romaniello asked the Council suspension for 15 minutes until we could bring together the leaders . The president of Lorenzi has thus granted the suspension, allowing them to meet. Present in addition to the president of Lawrence, the leader of the PDL Romaniello, that of the majority group Pucci (IDV) and myself for the PD. The leaders of the majority, having the many absences in their ranks (absent Belli, Gaspari, Di Lorenzo, Scisci for the majority, Jordanians and Wolves for the opposition) and the risk of having to postpone the approval of subdivisions and urban variants, have requested the undersigned to to allow, with the presence of the opposition, the validity of the session. I say this for the layman, the City Council shall be valid with the presence of 9 out of 17 advisers. Since for reasons of incompatibility (on urban issues can not be present to vote relatives of the officers concerned, or designers) some advice majority would have to leave the classroom, this explains why the request to the undersigned. Of course, for obvious political reasons, the undersigned has declined the invitation and announced that during the discussion of the points concerning the planning practices, he would come out of the classroom, as well as Mancini. It was so
back in the classroom and the Council began with the mayor's communications (in camera) as to the subject matter (concerning legal proceedings) there were obvious reasons of privacy (which is why I can not mention the content) .
After discussion of this first point, the meeting was reopened to the public. So I asked the floor to the president for two requests . In the first I asked the president to Lorenzi, since it has never been brought to the attention of the Council programmatic verification of this administration (as required by art. 15, Section 2 of the Municipal Constitution), the inclusion of this point to the next City Council. I also asked the mayor to know if there had been changes in powers conferred on the commissioners and directors, as some answers to our questions from the commissioners, I learned that some of them have positions unknown to us (the art. 21, paragraph 5 requires the auditor to report profit in the first session of the Council the powers granted). The mayor responded by saying I that there was no change compared to what has been reported, only one assessor had assigned a specific task (Zito for the "water issue").
At this point, the parent Romaniello asked again suspension of the Council for 15 minutes to assemble a majority and decide what to do. Back in the assembly, the same parent Romaniello asked the court to the Council at 13.15 (obviously to allow the majority to be able to call and get him some advice absent in the Council). The President has therefore suspended the session, giving appointment at 13.15.
At this time the Council has taken, with the presence than before the councilor Belli. Have thus been able to discuss questions the agenda. The first
submitted by the Council Mancini Anna Maria, was applied to the base stations mobile installed on our territory (the "antennae"). The answer is that Zito was the commissioner, apologized for the delay in replying, said that the antenna in Monte Honorius is currently not working, that arrangements have been made in this direction with the telephone company owner (Tim) and that September there should be a meeting with a professional to be able to draw the municipal plan for installing satellite dishes. Once again, citizenship does not just have to wait, hoping that it is not the same old broken promises. The
second question, always Mancini, concerned the issue of security in our area. The mayor has pledged after the summer recess, to convene a working group on the issue. The third
, always presented by Mancini, the work of the Civil Protection Rignano, received the reply councilor Officer Bell, who, after having briefly outlined the work done so far, he has also pledged to convene on the issue a meeting after the holidays. The fourth
submitted by the undersigned covered the contribution of € 12,000 granted to the Community Center elderly. The commissioner Costa replied that this expenditure is included in the payment of the traditional dinner given by the municipality at the beginning of each year for the elderly and disabled people (not just members of the Centre) but also other costs including the "panettone Christmas ". Having received the proofs of expenditure, as well as required, I alderman questioned the lack of transparency with which the current administration granting these contributions (including those in other associations) and, since the amount awarded (Again, not having the receipts tax), it seems fair but not particularly with respect to attendance at dinner, I asked that next year the social lunch is paid directly by the City (without passing through the center), so that we can be more control. On the fifth
question presented by the directors and Wolves Di Lorenzi , relating to grants made by the Social Services , Costa has always responded to the commissioner, listing the ways to provide grants, awarded based on the value of 'ISEE, for which the request must be submitted to the social worker town. It has been said that we should draw a municipal regulation, when the Rignano does not have it. On the sixth
submitted by the undersigned and on the condition of the joint venture public-private formed by the city, said Deputy Mayor Earl highlighting the good results, in his opinion, achieved so far by both the Farmarignano that ASI (the "multi"). Conte also announced that after September, after news also provided for the new financial subsidiaries for a few days passed by Parliament, will be discussed in Council and amendments to proposals being drafted. On the subject, pointing out that however, given the favorable reviews are personal opinions and not the result of objective data, so quite questionable, I countered by saying that, instead, the data so far had on the development of society (especially with regard to the ASI) do not show an advantage for local banks as well as the quality of services offered, should be better explained the criteria for concluding contracts for employees ASI, appear illegitimate in the way any expectations of services (see what the summer recreational centers for children) and Above all, there is obviously some serious irregularities and breach of the SIA has not yet approved its budget. It would be the case, I proposed that the two companies to be added to an item on the agenda of the next Council meeting to discuss administrative guidelines that the administration wants to give to them. The next
question, entitled to submit and signed on to ' implementation of the reform Brunetta ", received the Council's response Romaniello councilor and Berretta, who said they are working on the issue and that will be established soon for updates. On the subject, taking a cue from the session "Transparency should be provided on the website of the City from its" reform Brunetta, "I asked for a greater commitment on the website of the City, which so far has seen only a waste of money for frankly disappointing results. In my opinion the site of the City, if run, could actually result in increased efficiency for the work of the City and streamline much of the work of offices, providing a useful tool for citizenship. The next two
questions, submitted by the undersigned and Mancini have covered the water problem . A reply has been Mayor and Alderman Zito. From the answers had not satisfied we feel: the problem of water has caused many inconveniences to the citizens and nine years, the mayor promises never avveratesi solutions, connection to Peschiera repeatedly proclaimed by the mayor is now only a beautiful promise (among other things, not shared even within the same majority) and the well of Pietrolo, which should provide the solution found by the administration, is unusable because the water was found from the analysis of local health authorities the presence of arsenic. The question of the administration Coletta results are still inadequate and therefore worrying.
L ' last question, this is also submitted by the undersigned and Mancini, on Summer camps for children , Berretta councilor received the reply, which really has not responded to any of our question: is the legitimate expectations of the service to ASI only by resolution of the Board (not serve instead of the Council)? what are the terms of agreement between the ASI and the Association Mary Poppins, who has worked with the first in the management of the Centres? have been complied with health and safety? There is an authorization to use the school canteen? it should not be authorized by the school board? what kind of insurance policy was taken out? Not having received our response to these questions, re-querying.
As provided in the Regulations of the Council, I therefore presented in class 3 urgent questions about the Variation of the PRG, the contribution paid by the Lazio Region for the preparation of a recovery plan nuclei arise spontaneously building el 'connection to the Peschiera . The majority has refused to respond immediately in the courtroom, promising the answer later. I wonder: why do not respond right away? the mayor or the aldermen delegates were not ready to give answers? Yet arguments should be made known to them, as they relate to matters dealt with in some posters. Or what they write is not true, and then put it City Council would be a grave?
After the discussion of questions, we moved to the other items on the agenda relating to urban issues . The undersigned and Mancini we out of the classroom is still the majority which had quorum for the approval of the points, only, thanks to the presence here of President Di Lorenzi (UDC). They were thus adopted the two-storey corporate usage, the variant of the master plan and the variant at Monte Larco development plan "Madonna delle Grazie". Was not approved that "Facchinaccia" because two commissioners are due to go out for the incompatibilities described above (Earl and Bell).
The majority continues to have great difficulty holding and "government" , the opposition still gets a "half" victory ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment