My declaration of the vote against An administration City should put the target within its purpose, to better meet the needs of the community, with less use of resources, proving capable of creating utility, or value, with the constraint of maintaining the integrity of their capital base.
In this respect, plays a key role in the careful analysis of the annual report that, in addition to providing economic information and financial transactions, they must also show the results produced by the socially relevant and possible to assess the impact of policies Council services and local social welfare and the economy established.
And despite the incompleteness of the data set, especially the scarcity of information contained in the report of the Executive and the Auditor, in contrast with what exists under the regulations (see TUEL and accounting), what emerges from STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 2009 of Rignano Flaminio is a disastrous management , fruit of a ruling class (perhaps for some current administrator, is also exaggerated the use of this term) to the challenges that a country now has 10,000 inhabitants.
Our vote, therefore, can not only be contrary , not "bias", but rather a result of careful consideration, here in the interest of community, among other assessment made very difficult by the unlawful conduct and the Head of an obstructive ("deaf" even to the calls of the provincial Ombudsman), which has denied us the chance to see - not even showing up for appointments from him same set - and have a copy of certain records deemed essential to the accomplishment of our mandate and reinforcement of accounting documents (acts aimed at both the reliability of the findings reflected in the budget, is to provide an overview, albeit brief, on real financial position, in contrast with the accounting of "verifiable information"), as the budgets of the Company participate in mixed public-private (especially in Asia s.rl., for which the City has taken in recent days to sell its shares - the notice, published on December 30 last year, ending January 11 tomorrow, is seriously flawed by irregularities and illegal, account for which, however, ask the competent authorities,), the inventory table deficitarietà and the structural parameters with performance management three years (tables are not attached to the account of the Budget, as is provided by art. TUEL 5 of c. 228), in addition to the financial Details of staff costs and administration (see attached request of December 9 us - prot. 19382).
If you add further that:
- Report 2009 is the submission to the Board for its approval even seven months after the schedule (by June 30, 2010) and the failure to approve the terms determines until the performance, the condition of local government structural deficit, subject to central controls on covering the cost of certain services would be detrimental to the operation of the administration and its image, witnessing a conduct not in compliance with sound financial management;
- Heritage Account was established done without updating the inventory (the current administration has never done so), as envisaged by art. 230 c. 7 of TUEL;
- the report of the Auditor , in our opinion does not comply with the legislation, it is quite incomplete and some points not corresponding to reality (because, for example, it is reported that municipal solid waste disposal has led to a positive balance between income and costs, in contrast with art. 61, D. Lgs. November 15, 1993, n. 507, where it says that the revenue total fee for the disposal of municipal solid waste may not exceed the cost of operating the service for the disposal of such waste and that this difference should be inserted between the funds tied or even returned to the users?). Among other things, the function of the Review Body report is not expected to exhaust in the simple verification of the regularity of the formal statement, but instead would require a thorough analysis of the management exercise conducted to verify the correspondence of the same principles efficiency and economy. Its incompleteness, however, leaves us more doubts than certainties, because there is no sign whether they are maintained budget in doubtful or difficult if the proceeds of collection and administration have been placed under the chargeability amounts of credits? Why not say whether it was complied with the debt limit provisions of art. 204, TUEL? Because the auditor did not say if the personnel expenditure committed in 2009 has been reduced compared to 2008, as required by financial regulations? Why do not you say anything about respect or less of the Stability Pact? As the Auditor has been able to certify the property, without the inventory and because of this lack did not mention it? How do you understand if it has been established in the 2009 Report that the amounts credited to Title V of the entry - Cat. 03 and 04, have been used exclusively to finance the investment expenditure of Title II?
- Statement in 2009, despite having spent as many as 25,000 euro for the verification of the residues assigned to an outside company (remember, among other things, which I have criticized this spending while approving the 2010 Budget estimate, as it sees a serious illegality by subtraction skills and diseconomy), yet appear surplus with large and well-founded doubts about their actual consistency and enforceability (see, for example, refunds not yet had an advance payment for election-related) which in fact are contrary to accounting principle of prudence and which affect the accuracy of accounting data, they can cause, not a surplus of government, as once again this administration has the courage and the "audacity" to present (about 678,000 € 570,000 in any case bound), but a disastrous deficit;
- Income in the Budget - Release, intervention 2 09 05 01 / 2, is given an expense paid for with no mandate 117 of 19.01.2009 residues account for the supply and installation of the door of Pharmacy for € 4620.00, because such spending is among the operations of waste disposal? is a misuse of funds? This case, however, This is not the only (see also incorrect charging of costs for school policies);
- in salary expense reimbursement (payment made with the mandates of the No 1408 to 1413 of 05.04.2009), include certain amounts relating use of part-time staff hired "on loan" from the City of Faleria: how was it possible to pay those staff without a signed agreement between the municipalities? There may be details of loss of revenue?
- Income in the Budget - Release, include expenses related to lots of loc. Pietrolo - PIP area and the construction of the sewer system in the locality. Montelarco financed with the proceeds of private not yet been received and then generating a huge deficit CASH (this only for now, but if the money is found to be more collected, what cause? A hole in the budget?)
this would be enough to justify our vote against . But besides these reasons, mostly technical and formal, there are also policies in relation to the targets achieved by the Administration and the results that are visible to everyone.
Management Administration Coletta-Conte (Deputy Mayor dear, we'd really like to know which side, in the latest issue of Thought , your mimeographed, in presenting herself as the next candidate for mayor, tried to disassociate themselves from the management), in fact, bankruptcy is also from political point of view, considering that the POWER MANAGEMENT for 2009 closed with a deficit of around € 300,000 (he was paid more than it received) and the FUND FUND of the City dramatically increased by € 1,100,426.60 on 31.12.2006 (closing date of the last year before the election of the Directors) to the desolate figure 31.12.2009 "0" - "zero" € (and, fortunately, we are not aware of how it ended 2010, in anticipation of still Cash is already requested for 2010 for 2011!). Financial autonomy has fallen from 82% in 2007 and 2008 to less than 70% in 2009. If this data
sheer numbers, there are also the ratings performance of the management of investee companies, a real failure, as well as those on the quality of services offered ( for waste disposal, however, it collects more of what is spent, not yet activated, one of the few remaining municipalities of the province, alternative forms of management such as curbside collection), the situation of infrastructure (first of all the municipal water supply, the roads and schools), the management capacity of municipal assets and the profits arising from their use, the sale of real estate (remember the "warehouses" in Via Vivaldi and lots in the locality. Montelarco), the support provided to businesses and craft, the total lack of transparency in the administration (which should be a duty, as to make the public administration, according to the famous image, a "glass house") and the continuing illegality (not least, the one reported in 'last board meeting of 2010, against the current Deputy Mayor, Eng. Maurizio Conte, former candidate for mayor in the upcoming elections municipal councilor and Deputy Mayor that, as a professional responsibility by individuals, violating the provisions of art. C. 78 3 of TUEL - "The members of the municipal council responsible for planning, construction and public works should refrain from exercising professional activities in the field of public and private construction in the territories administered by them," continues to sign development plan, business plans for the use and, more generally, variations of town planning, is the most obvious conflict of interest), the increased use of resources for running costs with exceptional nature (see building permits or sanctions CDS), which should instead be reduced since it is a possible factor of uncertainty for local accounts, the incredible increase in costs for litigation, arbitrations and counseling, management, patronage of the contributions in favor of groups that favors only "friends of friends" ( among others, often without adequate reporting) and not those who actually plays with skill and activity on the territory, the under-exploitation of strategic resources (see the municipal seal or the use of renewable energies such as solar on municipal buildings), the lack a serious and responsible policy for young people, that was never carried out during the term, as expected Instead the legislation, the verification of program guidelines and even the last year to survey the implementation of programs, all that said, it is easy to justify voting against. Even where positive feedback may arise, at least among manufacturers and entrepreneurs in recent years have seen increased its business and earnings, a more careful analysis, given the current situation characterized by many unsold buildings vacant and in some cases, responsibilities of the current directors, in addition to the adverse economic situation, can not be taken into account, since have not been able to make "attractive" our country, perhaps the emphasis on cultural policies and the provision of adequate services more than just urban growth, with the profound inability to integrate the new with the old residents.
is why, for the reasons stated above, we ask that this statement is an integral part of the minutes of the session and that they, together with all necessary documentation, should be promptly sent to the Judiciary and all the accounting bodies of competence for all matters appropriate, reserving any necessary future action to restore the legality of acts of citizenship in the only interest Rigney.
now, but already some time, the council Coletta-Count no longer has a political project for the development of a concrete improvement of quality of life, than to continue to operate for their own personal gain and cultivate a sterile consent (even a false unanimity of pure facade, close to the election date, is coming out in the open, we are no longer the only ones who think so, see the latest release by the Government and Majority Councillor Di Lorenzo). For too many months pulling a live, improvised, chase each other only in emergencies. And little will help the efforts that we will try to put in place in recent months of pre-election propaganda: Rigney the pitfalls we have fallen in your once before (by the way, what happened to the variation in land-use plan much-publicized and still you have not been able to pass?), they will not the second. Rignano is a ship without a course, which sails in sight. Mr. Mayor and Mr. Vice, where you want to bring (if at least you know it)?
Witness the result of the 2009 Report, now being approved, Rignano really needs a new mayor, a new commander who, together with a new "crew", will be able to take off this ship, which has as its priority a new participatory democracy, beginning with the now forming the next City Council. I say this without irony or offensive intent, but only as an encouragement to those who today has the honor of sitting around this table and those who will, in short, the honor to sit down: you are not sent here to make up the numbers and even for practice Devotion (unfortunately, many of my colleagues, during these years, I have not even heard his voice or known the mind - that have given assistance in terms of proposals, ideas and activities?). I hope to Rignano, at a time when we need the contribution and responsibility of everyone, even at the expense of a little 'personal visibility in the interests of the wider community, because we're all in this together, that these suggestions are taken into consideration for the next compilation of the lists and that applications do not serve much to build a coalition capable of winning only one, but really to elect a new leadership capable, worthy and far-sighted, which has the horizon is not 's today, but tomorrow, that tomorrow full of exciting challenges, first and foremost that the construction of metropolitan Rome. For Rignano need it is, our country.
