just ended has been a really busy week, with scheduled two town councils and the Congress of the circle Pd Rignano. But I go in order, trying to summarize what happened (among other things, as promised in an earlier post , I put here at your disposal the texts of the Regulations approved by the City Council Rignano the Regulation on access to information for municipal councilors and the accounting ). Friday 26 was held City Council. The most important topics discussed were:
- Population public administrators : finally was voted unanimously the proposal I submitted with the Adviser Giordani, as representatives of the Democratic Party, for the construction on the website of the City of a special information area that can give people some information on elected officials (curriculum, data sheets, proposals, documents ...) thus making their actions more transparent and encouraging the awareness among citizens on the most important documents of the City (Council and Board resolutions, statements, questions ...) - I believe that our victory in the battle that we are doing from the beginning of our mandate for greater transparency and administrative law (you can read here text full proposal);
- Motion of support for the proposed regional law advanced by Mr. Olimpia Tarzia together with his colleagues on the "Reform and retraining of family planning clinics " presented by Mayor Coleman, had voted against us advisers Pd (Marcorelli and Jordan) and Mr Mancini, abstained advisers Berretta and Pucci (but IDV representatives are not just a regional quell'IdV that is opposed by any force, including most of the PD, so the bill is not passed?), voted in favor of all others, including directors of 'UDC - the reasons we voted against it can be read here ;
- Motion on " initiatives to combat the mafia and development of law and transparency on the part of local authorities - Commitment to the Commons to become a civil party to proceedings involving the mafia government "presented by the Group Board of the UDC, was unanimously voted favorably;
- Motion on ' Metropolitan Area of \u200b\u200bRome: I am presenting, this one has received a favorable vote of all present - the motion commits the Mayor to take action, together with other municipalities in the province of Rome, in order that the establishment of the Area Rome metro (provided by the constitutional reform of 2001 - art. 114, c. 1 and 2, and already the law 142/90) see a broad civic involvement all the municipalities involved (and not as heretofore, only the upper levels of government), I believe this fundamental argument about the fate of our country, in this process will be decided on the possible development of our country and stay out of decisions could be vital.
At the end of the Council, I and Jordan, as in recent days has been shown to the Commission on the new council Variations to the governor general (the tool that draws the town planning of our country) have renewed the request, already also presented by our party by means of posters for the country, to convene as soon as a 'public assembly to illustrate to citizens and all social forces. We look forward to a positive response. The second session
Council was held Tuesday, November 30 instead. Here's what happened:
- the majority did not have a quorum to approve the detailed plan of the fund building assault "Monte Norio" and business utilization plan (which allows for some exceptions to those urbastico-building and farmers) in loc. Colonel: given the absence of certain directors of majority (Gaspari, Di Lorenzo and Scisci) and "forced" the deputy mayor Conte (as designer of the two plans in question, can not participate in the vote), the output of the classroom we all opposition councilors present (besides me, Mancini, Lorenzo and Wolves) has missed the numbers for a majority vote to be valid - perhaps the current administration is not as compact as some would have us believe? the facts speak for us ...;
- were approved by the Majority some general guidelines for the monetization of the areas in Area C to be sold in accordance with the technical standards for implementing the Master Plan General : The measure affects some areas of residual (small) within the plans of subdivision to the city but that would remain of limited use for public interest and therefore the council would have the ability to sell to interested citizens (who must be owners of land adjoining or adjacent) - as the opposition voted against the measure because, even if valid as a general rule, the proposal as proposed has some issues too discretionary ( incomplete), for more entrusted to the Board and the Council (the body that should have powers over planning issues);
- the majority agreed with the dissenting votes of Mancini and Jordanians, in addition to my (Di Lorenzo and Wolves UDC had already left the courtroom), the 'bedding general budget of the financial year 2010 aspects on which there are too many doubts: I remember that the current administration has not yet approved the Report 2009 (I wonder then how can one be sure of the figures of 2010, without having assessed as we closed the year before?) also continue to increase the sums allocated to litigation and arbitration (for lawyers who defend the City in cases), there are € 8,000 for interest expense, a symptom of a debt situation very worrying and, finally, I believe that this aspect is not negligible, was not planned withdrawal of regional funding for about 90,000 € Polverini made by the Government for the construction of sidewalks in Gramsci might have to make our town a few off-balance sheet debt because the transfer was done to hired a designer.
between the two Councils, has also celebrated the final phase of our Congress party which saw the election of new secretary Umberto Montanari and the new Board, of which I am also part I (for complete results see site of the Democratic Party of Rignano ). In addition, together with Simone Plebani, I was also elected as the Delegate Assembly province of Rome.
0 comments:
Post a Comment